EASTERN FEDERAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS APPELLEE,
v.
ROYAL PARK WEST, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES-CROSS APPELLANTS
EASTERN FEDERAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-CROSS APPELLEE,
ROYAL PARK WEST, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES-CROSS APPELLANTS
459 F.2d 1391
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
There being issues of fact as to damages for resolution by the jury and sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict under the Boeing Co. v. Shipman 1 standard, and the deed having been delivered and conveying property to the grantee in full, unconditional satisfaction of the debt rather than as security to be held for the payment of the debt, under the clear terms of'the agreement between the parties, so that there was no mortgage under Florida law,2 we affirm the judgment of the district court in all respects, both as to appeal and cross-appeal.
Affirmed.
. 411 F. 2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969)
. Florida Statutes § 697.01(1), F.S.A.; Holmberg v. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787, 108 So. 211 (1926); Pilkington v. Rose, 88 Fla. 547, 102 So. 751 (1925).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Alexander v. Henderson, 470 F.2d 1370 (5th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- The Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Holmberg v. Cary A. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787 (Fla. 1925)
- Pilkington v. Rose, 88 Fla. 547 (Fla. 1925)