UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES CHALMERS CLEMENCE, II, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
JAMES CHALMERS CLEMENCE, II, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
460 F.2d 320
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In this prosecution for refusing induction [50 U.S.C. App. § 462], appellant relies primarily on his claim that there was no basis in fact for the local board’s classifying him I-A in the face of evidence of medical disability. The medical evidence did not clearly present a prima facie case for exemption; but if it did, the finding of acceptability by the examining center provides a basis for the classification in this case.
The trial court properly refused to redetermine appellant’s other claims. United States v. Shunk, 438 F. 2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Brunges, 450 F. 2d 947 (9th Cir. 1971); and Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 91 S.Ct. 1319, 28 L.Ed.2d 625 (1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Cantero, 471 F.2d 1190 (9th Cir. 1972)
Authorities Cited
- Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99 (U.S. 1971)
- United States v. Shunk, 438 F.2d 1204 (9th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Brunges, 450 F.2d 947 (9th Cir. 1971)