THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CANAL ZONE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MICHAEL JOSEPH O'CONNOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE CANAL ZONE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
MICHAEL JOSEPH O'CONNOR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
460 F.2d 1004
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In conformity with the requirements established by Anders v. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 498, we have carefully considered this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Richard M. Olsen, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F. 2d 521, and United States v. Crawford, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F. 2d 1085.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Sheppard, 688 F.2d 952 (5th Cir. 1982)
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Minor, 444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Crawford, 446 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1971)