TRACY WELDON BOSLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CARL C. HOCKER, WARDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1972-06-20
No. 26052
Before KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges, and TURRENTINE, District Judge.
460 F.2d 1064 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

The issues presented upon this appeal are identical to those which were recently resolved by our court in Mathis v. Hocker, 459 F. 2d 988 (9th Cir. 1972). We are bound by that decision (see Etcheverry v. United States, 320 F. 2d 873, 874 (9th Cir. 1963)); hence, the judgment of the District Court in this case is

Affirmed.

Concurrence
ELY, Circuit Judge

ELY, Circuit Judge

(concurring):

Under the compulsion of Mathis, I concur in the result. At the same time, however, I record my disagreement with the Mathis result and with some of the reasoning that produced it.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw