UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOHN LEE BOWEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the search and seizure were lawful and the circumstantial evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict on drug possession.
During a search for aliens, an officer found marijuana and depressant drugs in the appellant's rented camper. The appellant was convicted of smuggling…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Concurrent Sentences cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
John Lee Bowen appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for violation of 21 U.S.C.. 176(a) and 21 U.S.C. 331 (q) (3) (B) (smuggling and transporting smuggled marijuana and possession of depressant and stimulant drugs).
While searching Bowen’s rented camper for aliens, Immigration Officer Ort-meier first smelled and then found in the camper nearly 356 pounds of marijuana bricks of the type and packaged in the manner that usually comes from Mexico, along with backpacking equipment and burlap bags marked Product of Mexico. One hundred fifty-eight benzedrine tablets were found in the pocket of a jacket in the cab of the camper. Questions raised on appeal are whether the search and seizure were lawful, whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that the marijuana had been unlawfully imported by appellant and whether appellant knew it had been unlawfully imported when he transported it.
The search and seizure were plainly lawful. The circumstantial evidence of knowledge of unlawful importation on Count 2 of the Indictment, though not overwhelming, was clearly sufficient to support the jury verdict. The question of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the smuggling charge of Count 1 need not be reached since the sentences on Counts 1 and 2 were identical and concurrent. United States v. Aranda, 9th Cir., 1972, 457 F. 2d 761.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Williams v. State, 403 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
-
Bowen v. United States, 422 U.S. 916 (U.S. 1975)
-
United States v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- United States v. Aranda, 457 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1972)