CLYDE BAKER, APPELLANT,
v.
SCHOOL BOARD OF MARION COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A Florida school board dismissed an elementary teacher for immorality and misconduct based on marijuana and alcohol found in a nightclub office he co-operated with his brother. The appellate court reversed, holding that there was insufficient evidence that Baker possessed the contraband, as the brother admitted ownership of the marijuana and the county court found no evidence linking Baker to the alcohol.
The court reversed Baker's dismissal, holding that there was insufficient substantial competent evidence to establish that Baker possessed either the marijuana or the illegal alcohol. Regarding the marijuana, Baker's statement accepting responsibility was based on a sense of responsibility to his brother rather than personal knowledge, and his brother immediately acknowledged ownership. Regarding the alcohol, the county court found a complete absence of evidence that the liquor belonged to Baker or that he knew it was on the premises.
[1] Possession of marijuana may constitute "immorality" under Florida Statutes chapter 231.
[2] A teacher's dismissal for immorality or misconduct in office requires substantial, competent evidence of the alleged misconduct.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“While Baker stated to the agents that he 'was the manager and responsible for the marijuana,' the county judge, in dismissing the charges against Baker, noted that Baker's statement was based upon a sense of responsibility to his brother and not upon personal knowledge of the presence of the marijuana.”
Establishes that Baker's admission was not based on actual knowledge or possession, undermining the immorality finding.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBaker, an elementary school teacher, was arrested for possession of illegal alcohol and marijuana found in a dresser drawer of a nightclub office he o…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Possession cases and more on FLexlaw
SCOTT, R.C., Associate Judge.
The crux of this case is whether Baker’s dismissal on grounds of immorality and misconduct in office, under section 231.-36(6), Florida Statutes (1981),1 is supported by substantial, competent evidence.
Baker, an elementary school teacher, was arrested for possession of illegal alcohol and marijuana. The criminal charges were subsequently dismissed by the county court. The Professional Practices Council, an agency authorized to take disciplinary action against a teacher, found no probable cause for the suspension or revocation of Baker’s teaching certificate. Nevertheless, the School Board refused to reinstate Baker and, after a hearing, found that Baker’s conduct constituted immorality and misconduct in office. Thereupon, the School Board dismissed Baker from employment.
At the outset, we note that possession of marijuana has been held to constitute “im morality” under chapter 231, Florida Statutes. See Adams v. State Professional Practices Council, 406 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). However, we must determine whether there is substantial, competent evidence that Baker possessed marijuana in order to conclude that he is guilty of immorality. See School Board of Nassau County v. Arline, 408 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
The record here establishes that marijuana seeds were found by beverage agents in a dresser drawer in the office of a nightclub which was operated by Baker and his brother.2 While Baker stated to the agents that he “was the manager and responsible for the marijuana,” the county judge, in dismissing the charges against Baker, noted that Baker’s statement was based upon a sense of responsibility to his brother and not upon personal knowledge of the presence of the marijuana. Baker’s brother, when confronted with the marijuana, immediately acknowledged ownership of the illegal substance. In view of the absence of any evidence that Baker knew of the marijuana’s presence in the drawer, substantial competent evidence did not exist establishing that he had constructive possession of the contraband. See Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250 (Fla.1983).
As to the possession of illegal alcohol, two opened bottles of liquor were found in the nightclub office. The office was upstairs and separate from the nightclub itself. The county court also dismissed this charge, finding a complete absence of evidence that the liquor belonged to Baker or that he knew it was on the premises. In light of this conclusion, we hold that no showing of immorality or misconduct in office was established on this ground.
The School Board argues that the record establishes that Baker’s effectiveness as a teacher has been impaired at the elementary school where he taught and that this alone justifies his dismissal. While it is true that the school principal testified as to the impairment of Baker’s teaching effectiveness, we must reject this argument, otherwise whenever a teacher is accused of a crime and is subsequently exonerated with no evidence being presented to tie the teacher to the crime, the school board could, nevertheless, dismiss the teacher because the attendant publicity has impaired the teacher’s effectiveness. Such a rule would be improper. See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Because there is a lack of substantial, competent evidence to support the findings that Baker was guilty of immorality or misconduct in office, the Board’s final order must be REVERSED.
DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur. . This section provides in relevant part:
Any member of the district administrative or supervisory staff and any member of the instructional staff, including any principal, may be suspended or dismissed at any time during the school year; provided that the charges against him must be based on immorality, misconduct in office, incompetency, gross insubordination, willful neglect of duty, drunkenness, or conviction of any crime involving moral turpitude.
. Baker’s brother apparently used the office to sleep in from time to time.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Forehand v. Sch. Bd. OF Wash. Cnty., 481 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…d 1391 (1983) (e.s.); Rita v. State, 470 So. 2d 80, 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Kresbach v. State, 462 So. 2d 62 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). This rule has also been applied to administrative disciplinary proceedings. See Baker v. School Board of Marion County, 450 So. 2d 1194, 1195 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984). In the case at bar, the evidence clearly establishes that appellant and his mother were in joint possession of the premises, and that others had access to the premises, including the garden area. It was necessary for the…
-
MacMILLAN v. Nassau Cnty. Sch. Bd., 629 So. 2d 226 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)…investigation. Other than the Superintendent’s conelusory remarks, we find no evidence demonstrating a loss of effectiveness in the school system. Accordingly, the order dismissing MacMillan must be reversed. Baker v. School Board of Marion County, 450 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (publicity attendant to allegations of misconduct in office and immorality was not, of itself, a proper basis for a finding of impaired effectiveness as a teacher); Braddock v. School Board of Nassau County, 455 So. 2d 394 (Fla.…
-
Sherburne v. Sch. Bd. OF Suwannee Cnty., 455 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…the relationship was “community knowledge” where that knowledge resulted after-the-fact from the Board’s own activities. See Boyette v. State Professional Practices Counsel, 346 So. 2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Baker v. School Board of Marion County, 450 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), opinion filed May 10, 1984. The Board’s action in favoring appellant with a teaching contract for three years, and its tender of an annual contract for the fourth year (subsequent to the events which it now advances as disqualif…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Bd. of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1972)
- Brown v. State, 428 So. 2d 250 (Fla. 1983)
- The Sch. Bd. OF Nassau Cnty. v. Arline, 408 So. 2d 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- Adams v. State, 406 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)