EDWARD J. A. ALBRECHT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIS NELSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a guilty plea is not constitutionally infirm if it is primarily motivated by fear of the death penalty, even if influenced by counsel.
Albrecht, convicted of murder, petitioned for habeas corpus, claiming his guilty plea was involuntary due to coercion by his trial counsel. The distri…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Involuntary Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Albrecht, a California prisoner convicted of murder, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The basis of Al-brecht’s petition was his claim that his guilty plea was involuntary because it was the product of coercion on the part of his trial counsel. The District Court conducted an evidentiary hearing, but it could find no merit to Albrecht’s contention. We affirm.
From the evidence adduced at the hearing, the District Court determined: (1) Albrecht was influenced; but not legally coerced, by his counsel, and (2) Al-brecht’s plea was primarily motivated by his fear of the death penalty which was based upon his affection for his child. From these facts, the court concluded that the plea was not constitutionally infirm.
We cannot, of course, disturb the challenged decision unless it is clearly erroneous. See Moss v. Craven, 427 F. 2d 139 (9th Cir. 1970); Knowles v. Gladden, 378 F. 2d 761 (9th Cir. 1967). On the record before us, we cannot find error. There was substantial justification for concluding, as did the District Court, that Albrecht’s plea was valid. See Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 25 L.Ed.2d 785 (1970); McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970); Brady v. United States, 397 U. S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970); Knowles v. Gladden, supra.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jewell Jess Stone v. Cardwell, 620 F.2d 212 (9th Cir. 1980)
-
Bellew v. Gunn, 532 F.2d 1288 (9th Cir. 1976)
-
Burchett v. Cardwell, 493 F.2d 492 (9th Cir. 1974)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (U.S. 1970)
- McMANN v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (U.S. 1970)
- Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790 (U.S. 1970)
- Commodore William Moss v. Craven, 427 F.2d 139 (9th Cir. 1970)
- Knowles v. Gladden, 378 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1967)