THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
ROBERT MIKE, II, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(4) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Mike’s alleged misconduct. Mike tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment, acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4), 1-102(A)(6), 3-101(B) and article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) of The Florida Bar’s Integration Rule. The referee recommended that Mike be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand and be placed on probation for two years.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand, and Robert Mike, II, is placed on probation for two years, effective thirty days from the filing of this opinion, and during his probation his practice shall be supervised with quarterly status reports on his cases being submitted to The Florida Bar. Costs in the amount of $761.59 are hereby taxed against Mike.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, OV-ERTON, McDonald and EHRLICH, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
Maxwell v. Louie L. Wainwright, 490 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 1986)…g recommendation, either for death or life imprisonment, had to be by majority vote. There was no objection at trial so the error, if error there was, was waived and provides no basis for relief by way of a collateral proceeding. Ford v. Wainwright, 451 So. 2d 471 (Fla.1984); Armstrong v. State, 429 So. 2d 287 (Fla.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865, 104 S.Ct. 203, 78 L.Ed.2d 177 (1983). Moreover, we believe that affording relief on the ground of this asserted error would depend on a showing of prejudice. Jackson…
-
Bain v. State, 730 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…ware that “fundamental error” is an important term of art in the law, and they were familiar with the range of compelling circumstances in which courts have applied the concept to permit appellate review of unpreserved errors. See Ford v. Wainwight, 451 So. 2d 471, 475 (Fla.1984) (stating that legislature is presumed to be acquainted with judicial decisions on the subject matter of statutes it enacts). In light of this, the legislature’s unqualified use of the term fundamental error in the first sentence of s…
-
Jackson v. State, 452 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1984)…ction 922.07, Florida Statutes (1983), by the governor’s commission of psychiatrists. This issue has been adversely decided against appellant in our decision in Goode v. Wainwright, 448 So. 2d 999 (Fla.1984), and most recently in Ford v. Wainwright, 451 So. 2d 471 (Fla.1984). Second, appellant requests a judicial determination of his competency to understand the nature of and assist his counsel in post-conviction proceedings. Appellant relies on section 916.11 and 916.12, Florida Statutes (1983), and Rule 3.…
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence