DONALD GARDNER AND JOHN DAVID RANKIN ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
J. F. THOMPKINS, EAST UNIT WARDEN, ETC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that even if the inmates' allegations were true, they did not rise to the level of constitutional significance required for a federal civil rights claim.
Nine inmates in administrative segregation sued, alleging deprivations of constitutional rights including denial of notarization, privileges, clean ra…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Federal Constitutional Rights cases and more on FLexlaw
FER CURIAM:
Nine inmates of the maximum security section of the Florida State Prison at Raiford sought to file a civil rights complaint seeking injunctive relief for asserted deprivations of Federal constitutional rights resulting from their confinement in administrative segregation apart from the general prison population. They alleged (i) denial of the right to have legal documents notarized in their presence and to retain such notarized documents in their possession, (ii) denial of outdoor yard, movie and canteen privileges, (iii) denial of clean razors and shaving mirrors, and (iv) de nial of the right to assemble together for religious services. The District Court, finding the allegations frivolous, denied permission to file the complaint in forma pauperis. We affirm.1
When a State prisoner asserts a claim which, if proven, could potentially evolve into a substantial Federal question of constitutional proportions, he is ordinarily entitled to an opportunity to prove his allegations. Williams v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1972, 461 F. 2d 1080 and companion cases. Here, however, even conceding the truth of each of the allegations, we cannot conclude that any of them involve actual or potential constitutional significance. If corrections are required, they must be implemented by the appropriate prison officials. Granville v. Hunt, 5 Cir., 1969, 411 F. 2d 9, 12.
Affirmed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F. 2d 1158.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Granville v. Hunt, 411 F.2d 9 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Williams v. Louie L. Wainwright, 461 F.2d 1080 (5th Cir. 1972)