PAUL K. HOPWOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1984-06-14
No. 83-1361
DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur., SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.
451 So. 2d 534 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1984)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. SHARP, J., dissents with opinion.

Dissent
SHARP, Judge,

SHARP, Judge,

dissenting.

Hopwood is attempting to appeal from his criminal conviction and sentence rendered after he entered a plea of no contest. He reserved no basis for appeal and does not argue that there is any exception, as set forth in Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979), that gives him the right to a direct appeal. Under these circumstances, this court has uniformly dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction. Stinson v. State, 448 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1984). That is what we should do in this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw