JAMES B. MAJORS, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES B. MAJORS, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
451 So. 2d 536
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Judge.
In this appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief, we hold that the language in the motion,
The prosecution withheld the name and address of a material witness; “The man with the shotgun” who would have testified favorably for the defense and could have verified the defendant’s demeanor as it was that day at the scene of the robbery and alleged conspiracy,
does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(e), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The other issues raised on appeal are without merit.
AFFIRMED.
SMITH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Golden v. State, 509 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…e clearly not valid in this case, as the state admits. The remaining two reasons relate to whether appellant’s motion complied with the informational requirements of rule 3.850. The legal standard is one of “substantial compliance.” Majors v. State, 451 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Although appellant’s original motion was somewhat deficient, his motion for rehearing supplied the two missing items of information in detail sufficient to meet the “substantial compliance” standard. Because appellant has substa…
-
Jenkins v. State, 479 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…e trial court. Of those, Ground 5 is without merit. Likewise, Ground 2 does not substantially comply with the requirements of Rule 3.850(f), as it fails to contain a state [*865] ment of the facts relied on in support of the ground. Majors v. State, 451 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Finally, the issue raised in Ground 1 is also without merit. Although there are apparently no Florida cases addressing this issue, the rule in most jurisdictions is that the issuance of an extradition warrant does not constitut…
-
Bustamante v. Elkin Gaviria, 741 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…PER CURIAM. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. See Fuller Enters. v. Michaels, 451 So. 2d 536, 537-38 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)(holding “[n]o citation of authority is needed to support the proposition that an appellate court 'may not, having once re [*1256] versed a final judgment of a lower court, sua sponte review that judgment again.... To do so…