RUDY CRUZ CUMPIAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER E. CRAVEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
RUDY CRUZ CUMPIAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
WALTER E. CRAVEN, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
465 F.2d 381
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Upon the factual findings of the District Court following full evidentiary hearing, Gairson v. Cupp, 415 F. 2d 352 (9th Cir. 1969), does not apply.
As to appellant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel since his attorney did not advise him of his right to appeal in forma pauperis and of the procedure to be followed in exercising this right, we agree with the District Court that he has not exhausted his state remedies in this respect.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders v. Craven, 488 F.2d 478 (9th Cir. 1973)
-
Kaiser Indus. Corp. v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 515 F.2d 964 (3d Cir. 1975)
Authorities Cited
- Gairson v. Hoyt C. Cupp, 415 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1969)