VICTOR FRANK SZIJARTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES F. LEGEMAN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE

9th Cir. | 1972-08-24
No. 71-2751
466 F.2d 864 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972) Negative Treatment
Cited by 21 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the dismissal of plaintiff’s action.

Plaintiff's claim was one for damages, and purportedly rested upon the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. § 1983). His allegations in substance were that defendant, an attorney whom plaintiff had retained, failed to render him reasonable assistance during a state criminal trial, to plaintiff’s injury.

But this Circuit, in common with others, has held that such a claim is not within the purview of the Civil Rights Act, the reason being that an attorney, whether retained or appointed, does not act “under color of” state law. Hence, the claim is not one coming within the jurisdiction of the district court. Dyer v. Rosenberg, 434 F. 2d 648 (9th Cir. 1970); Fletcher v. Hook, 446. F. 2d 14 (3rd Cir. 1971); Mulligan v. Schlachter, 389 F. 2d 231 (6th Cir. 1968); and see French v. Corrigan, 432 F. 2d 1211 (7th Cir. 1970).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw