UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
RICHARD ANDREW BATTIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

9th Cir. | 1972-08-31
No. 72-1674
466 F.2d 1194 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Richard Andrew Battin appeals from his conviction for failure to report for induction, in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. He argues here that the trial court erred in refusing to admit expert testimony that the 1970 draft lottery (held on December 1, 1969): (1) was not random in the sense that statisticians and other scientists use that word; (2) was not random in the ordinary English usage of that word; and (3) was so conducted that each registrant did not have the same chance of appearing at the top of the draft list as at the bottom or somewhere in the middle.

A similar contention was made and rejected in United States v. Kotrlik, 465 F. 2d 976 (9th Cir. 1972). On the authority of that decision we

Affirm.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw