APELLE KING A/K/A EDDIE KING A/K/A ANNETTE BISHOP, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
The order revoking probation on the basis that the defendant committed the offenses of burglary and petit theft while on probation is affirmed. The cause, however, is remanded to the trial court with directions to: (1) modify the written order revoking probation so as to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncements at the close of the probation revocation hearing, to wit: (a) strike the findings that the defendant failed to submit written reports and failed to pay the costs of her supervision, and (b) modify the finding that the defendant committed a burglary and a strong arm robbery so as to reflect that the defendant committed a burglary and a petit theft; and (2) give the defendant credit for any time spent in the county jail prior to the imposition of sentence as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1983). See Lund v. State, 396 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Affirmed in part and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Villanueva v. State, 637 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…’s oral findings at the conclusion of the probation revocation hearing. See Banks v. State, 626 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Hogwood v. State, 615 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Fairman v. State, 576 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); King v. State, 451 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Affirmed as modified.…
-
Saldana v. State, 510 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…or imposition of one in accordance with the guidelines as supplemented by Rule 3.701(d)(14). Upon remand, the trial court shall also conform the order revoking probation to its pronouncements at the time of the revocation hearing. See King v. State, 451 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Reversed and remanded with directions. DANIEL S. PEARSON, J., concurs.…
Authorities Cited
- Lund v. State, 396 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)