UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
EDDIE WOOD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1972-11-22
No. 72-2454
469 F.2d 676 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a commitment under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 requires a finding of probable danger to the public, and absent such a finding, the commitment is limited to a reasonable period to determine if competency can be attained.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant was committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 due to incompetency to stand trial. The commitment order required treatment and progress reports until …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was committed to the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246, after the district judge had concluded that appellant was not capable of standing trial on a charge of interstate transportation of a stolen motor vehicle. The order of commitment required that appellant be given extensive treatment, and that progress reports be submitted to the district court periodically until appellant is competent to stand trial or until the charges pending against him are disposed of according to law.

We believe that the district court erred in ordering appellant committed until he is in fact competent to stand trial. There was no finding below as to whether appellant would probably en danger the officers, property, or other interests of the United States; and without such a finding, a prisoner committed under Section 4246 may be held only for a reasonable period of time necessary to determine whether there is a substantial chance of his attaining competency to stand trial in the foreseeable future. Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 92 S.Ct. 1845, 1855, 32 L.Ed.2d 435 (1972).

We therefore modify the district court’s order of commitment to require that appellant be held at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners only for such time as is necessary to determine whether there is a substantial chance of his attaining competency to stand trial in the foreseeable future. If it appears from the Center’s periodic progress reports that his chances are good, then he may be held until trial. If, however, his chances are slight, or if he does not in fact improve, then he must be released or granted a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4247. Jackson v. Indiana, supra.

Affirmed as modified.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw