NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
FALLS DODGE, INC., RESPONDENT

6th Cir. | 1973-03-20
No. 72-1660
469 F.2d 906 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1973)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted enforcement of the National Labor Relations Board's order, finding substantial evidence supported the conclusion that the strike was legal.


Facts & Procedural History

The NLRB sought enforcement of its order against Falls Dodge, Inc. The court had previously remanded the case for findings on whether a salesmen's str…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its second supplemental decision and order issued against respondent Falls Dodge, Inc., after proceedings before the Board on remand. The Board’s initial decision is reported at 171 N.L.R.B. 1580 (1968). In the subsequent enforcement proceeding before this court, NLRB v. Falls Dodge, Inc., 431 F. 2d 33 (6th Cir. 1970), this court found substantial evidence on the whole record to support enforcement of the Board’s order requiring the automobile agency to cease and desist from unfair labor practices, to rehire discharged union committeeman, and to bargain with the union involved.

In that same opinion, however, the court noted that the Board had made no finding as to whether a strike of salesmen had been legal or illegal under 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(1)(B) (1970). The court thereupon remanded the ease to the Board for specific findings of fact and Board decision.

The additional findings of fact have now been made after subsequent proceedings. The Board’s second supplemental decision and order is reported at 196 N.L.R.B. 95 (1972). On review of the record in this second enforcement proceeding, we find ample evidence in the supplemented record to support the conclusion that the March 1967 strike was a legal, unfair labor practice strike, and not an attempt to coerce the company to select the Automobile Dealers Association as its bargaining representative.

Enforcement of the Board’s order is granted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw