NICHOLAS RAMOS HERRERA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
NICHOLAS RAMOS HERRERA, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
DR. GEORGE J. BETO, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
469 F.2d 956
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Herrera was convicted in a Texas state court of unlawfully possessing a narcotic drug. On this habeas appeal petitioner contends that the prosecution knowingly acquiesced in the use of false testimony and that the trial -court erroneously refused to allow defense counsel to impeach the main prosecution witness. On oral argument before this court, Herrera’s case was consolidated with four other cases involving similar factual situations. It was undisputed that our disposition of the above two issues in any one case would of necessity control the same issues in the other cases. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Corpus v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1972, 469 F. 2d 953, the denial of the writ of habeas corpus by the district court is hereby
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dade Cnty. v. Yumbo, 348 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
-
Moviematic Indus. Corp. v. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Metro. Dade Cnty. & Metro. Dade Cnty., 349 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
-
Fisher's Island, Inc. v. Dade Cnty., 47 Fla. Supp. 129 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Corpus v. Beto, 469 F.2d 953 (5th Cir. 1972)