ROBERT O. BRENHAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. SUTTON'S STEEL & SUPPLY, INC., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
ROBERT O. BRENHAM, PLAINTIFF,
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, DEFENDANT-THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V. SUTTON'S STEEL & SUPPLY, INC., ET AL., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
469 F.2d 1095
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
On the basis of the district court’s well-reasoned opinion, reported at 328 F.Supp. 119, on the issue of whether appellant was entitled to the right of contribution from appellees in the instant ease, we affirm. Cf. United States v. Moore, 3d Cir. 1972, 469 F. 2d 788. See also Phillips v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Company, W.D.La. 1963, 219 F.Supp. 420.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698 (2d Cir. 1987)
-
Armstrong v. The Kan. City S. Ry. Co., 752 F.2d 1110 (5th Cir. 1985)
-
Browning Seed, Inc. v. Bayles, 812 F.2d 999 (5th Cir. 1987)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Leta Moore, 469 F.2d 788 (3d Cir. 1972)