IN THE MATTER OF GOLD MEDAL PACKING CORP., BANKRUPT. JOCELYN R. CANDIDO AND F. EUGENE ROMANO, APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM A. SCHMITT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Creditors lack standing to question the sufficiency of a bankruptcy petition, even after amendment.
Appellants, petitioning creditors, argued the bankruptcy effective date should be when their amended petition was allowed, not the original filing dat…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM:
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York affirming a decision of the referee in bankruptcy holding that the effective date of bankruptcy was August 15, 1963, the date of the original filing of the petition. Appellants argue that the effective date of bankruptcy is September 28, 1966 when the petitioning creditors were permitted to amend their petition to cure certain alleged defects in the original petition.
Creditors have no standing to question the sufficiency of the bankruptcy petition. While before 1938 any creditor could intervene and oppose adjudication, in 1938 Section 18(b) of the Bankruptcy Act was amended to eliminate the right of creditors to file .an answer and oppose a petition.
This court in In Re Carden, 118 F. 2d 677 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 314 U.S. 647, 62 S.Ct. 91, 86 L.Ed. 519 (1941), ruled on the exact issue raised in the instant case. In Cardan we held
“ . . . where there has been an amendment to the statute whereby such right formerly existent has been withdrawn, there has been the equivalent of a statutory denial of the right .... Consequently, the appellant was without standing to question the sufficiency of the petition.” Id. at 679.
Other Circuits have reached the same conclusion. E.g., Wynne v. Rochelle, 385 F. 2d 789, 798 n.9, rehearing en banc denied (5th Cir. 1967).
To hold otherwise would result in a flood of litigation and would add immeasurably to the difficulties of administering the Bankruptcy Act. The amendment to the Bankruptcy Act was adopted to avoid this result.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hunteman v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 314 U.S. 647 (U.S. 1941)
- McClave & Co. v. Carden, 314 U.S. 647 (U.S. 1941)
- In re Carden, 118 F.2d 677 (2d Cir. 1941)
- Angus G. Wynne, Jr. v. Rochelle, 385 F.2d 789 (5th Cir. 1967)