IN THE MATTER OF CLYDE R. JAMES, BANKRUPT. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL W. CEDOR, BANKRUPT. JAMES H. RIGGS, TRUSTEE AND APPELLANT,
v.
CLYDE R. JAMES, BANKRUPT AND APPELLEE; EDWARD M. WALSH, TRUSTEE AND APPELLANT, V. MICHAEL W. CEDOR, BANKRUPT AND APPELLEE
IN THE MATTER OF CLYDE R. JAMES, BANKRUPT. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL W. CEDOR, BANKRUPT. JAMES H. RIGGS, TRUSTEE AND APPELLANT,
CLYDE R. JAMES, BANKRUPT AND APPELLEE; EDWARD M. WALSH, TRUSTEE AND APPELLANT, V. MICHAEL W. CEDOR, BANKRUPT AND APPELLEE
470 F.2d 996
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1972)
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F. 2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Kokoszka, 479 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1973)
-
In re Brissette, 561 F.2d 779 (9th Cir. 1977)
-
In re Kingswood v. Carlyle Michelman-Appellee, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1970)
- In re Aveni v. Morton Richman in Bankruptcy, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972)