UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
CHARLES D. CAMERON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1973-02-13
No. 72-3303
471 F.2d 1372 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

This case is before us for the second time. On the first appeal we pretermitted a consideration of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction and reversed on other grounds.1

On the second trial a jury found Cameron guilty of having $560 in his possession knowing that it was stolen from a bank whose deposits were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(c). His sole contention on appeal is that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction.

We have carefully considered the record, and, taking the view most favorable to the Government, we find substantial evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Glasser v. United States, 1942, 315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680. The judgment is

Affirmed.

. United States v. Cameron, 5 Cir. 1972, 400 F. 2d 1394.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw