UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
v.
JAMES MUMOW VALENTINE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE,
JAMES MUMOW VALENTINE, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT
472 F.2d 164
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this marijuana importation case is affirmed.
All points in the attack on the composition of the trial jury have been heretofore resolved against the defendant in other eases in this circuit with the exception of the 40 mile rule on calling jurors. No showing is made that the rule is unreasonable or that defendant was prejudiced by it. Such a rule is authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1863(b)(7).
We find the evidence of guilt was adequate. The refusal of the court to grant the motion for a mistrial was not error. The consecutive terms of imprisonment were proper. Cf. United States v. Bishop, 462 F. 2d 127, 9 Cir. 1972.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hooks v. Roberts, 480 F.2d 1196 (5th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Bishop, 462 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1972)