THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
SAM NUCCIO, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6) cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon a complaint by The Florida Bar this Court appointed a referee to conduct a hearing regarding Nuccio’s alleged misconduct. Nuccio tendered a conditional guilty plea for consent judgment,* acknowledging his violation of Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6). The referee recommended that Nuccio be found guilty in accordance with his conditional plea and that he be given a public reprimand.
Neither side contests the referee’s report which we hereby adopt. Publication of this opinion in Southern Reporter will serve as the public reprimand.
Costs in the amount of $658.92 are hereby taxed against Nuccio.
It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C.J., and OVERTON, MCDONALD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. *
We feel it unnecessary to publish the full text of the plea. The Court file is open for inspection.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (27 total)
-
State v. Smith, 573 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 1990)…ion 90.801(2)(a) allows a prior inconsistent statement to be admitted as substantive evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted when it meets the narrow criteria of the statute, provided that the declarant testifies at trial. Moore v. State, 452 So. 2d 559 (Fla.1984). In Delgado-Santos, we established a bright-line rule that a law enforcement investigative interrogation conducted by the police, even if under oath, is not an “other proceeding” pursuant to section 90.801(2)(a). Accord Dudley v. State, 5…
-
Ellis v. State, 622 So. 2d 991 (Fla. 1993)…ng.” In construing the meaning of this undefined term, we must begin by noting that the pertinent language was derived from the Federal Rules of Evidence. Thus, federal court decisions on the same question are persuasive in Florida. Moore v. State, 452 So. 2d 559, 561-62 (Fla.1984). We also note that our own courts already have developed a fairly substantial body of law on the subject as well. It is clear, for example, that the term “other proceeding” encompasses grand jury hearings. United States v. Distle…
-
Penalver v. State, 926 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. 2006)…atement not made at the trial, it was made under oath at a grand jury proceeding, and it was inconsistent with Munroe’s trial testimony. Furthermore, the record does not demonstrate that a claim of error was preserved for review. See Moore v. State, 452 So. 2d 559, 561 (Fla.1984) (noting that a claim of error in admitting a prior inconsistent statement into evidence must be properly preserved for appellate review). Therefore, reversible error has not been demonstrated on this issue. VIII. ADMISSIBILITY OF S…
Previewing 3 of 27 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence