NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER,
v.
LARDNER ELEVATOR COMPANY, RESPONDENT

6th Cir. | 1973-03-05
No. 72-2005
474 F.2d 1396 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1973)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court granted the National Labor Relations Board's application for enforcement of its order against the respondent company.


Facts & Procedural History

The National Labor Relations Board applied for enforcement of its order against a respondent company. The case was before a panel appointed pursuant t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court

This case came on to be heard before a panel appointed pursuant to Rule 3(e) of this Court.1 The case is before the Court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order, issued June 26, 1972, against the respondent company. Reference is made to the Board’s decision and order, reported at 197 NLRB No. 145, for a detailed recitation of the facts.

The Court concludes that it is manifest that the questions on which the decision of the Court depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument within the contemplation of Rule 8 of the rules of this Court.

We find that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

It is ordered that enforcement be granted.

. “(e) Docket Control. In the interest of docket control, the chief judge may from time to time, in his discretion, appoint a panel or panels to review pending cases for appropriate assignment or disposition under Rules 7(e), 8 or 9 or any other rule of this court.”


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw