LUKE JOSEPH RENER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the district court did not err in denying the petition for a writ of error coram nobis.
Rener, convicted of attempted burglary and possession of narcotics, sought to vacate a prior federal conviction based on a Supreme Court decision. The…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Writ Of Error Coram Nobis cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
The district court denied Rener’s petition for writ of error coram nobis. We affirm.
Rener is confined in the Texas Department of Corrections by virtue of his convictions for attempted burglary and possession of narcotics. In his petition for coram nobis relief he sought to have a previously served federal conviction vacated on grounds that the 1952 conviction for possession of untaxed marihuana 1 was invalid under the decision of Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57.
The district court denied relief, finding that Rener had failed to present any “compelling circumstances” which would justify the grant of the extraordinary remedy of coram nobis.2 We agree.
Nowhere in the pleadings filed below did Rener allege that he is subject to any adverse effects emanating from the prior federal conviction. On the basis of the respondent’s answer filed in the district court stating that Rener was convicted and sentenced on four felony offenses subsequent to the 1952 conviction, it appears unlikely that such is the ease. The writ of error coram nobis should only be allowed to remedy manifest injustice. Cf. Reyes Correa-Negron v. United States, 5 Cir. 1973, 473 F. 2d 684. Its purpose is not to burden courts with the rendition of “futile decrees.” Rodgers v. United States, 5 Cir. 1971, 451 F. 2d 562, 563; United States v. Morgan, 1954, 346 U.S. 502, 74 S.Ct. 247, 98 L.Ed. 248.
For the first time on appeal, Rener attempts to raise the point that the 1952 conviction was used to enhance his present state sentence. We decline to consider this argument since the issue was never raised in the proceedings below. Reyes Correa-Negron v. United States, supra; United States v. Hall, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F. 2d 1277; Hemming v. United States, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F. 2d 11.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
. Rener was convicted under 26 U.S.C. § 2593(a), which has since been repealed. Thereafter, the provisions of § 2593(a) were contained in 26 U.S.C. § 4744, which has also been repealed.
. The district court, apparently under the erroneous impression that Rener had been convicted under the provisions contained in 21 U.S.C. § 176a, made the incorrect observation that the challenged conviction was valid since the Leary presumption of illegal importation was not used against him.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cavett v. Ellis, 578 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1978)
-
Moody v. United States, 874 F.2d 1575 (11th Cir. 1989)
-
United States v. Swindall, 107 F.3d 831 (11th Cir. 1997)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6 (U.S. 1969)
- United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1954)
- Reyes Correa-Negron v. United States, 473 F.2d 684 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Alva Eugene Hemming, III v. United States, 409 F.2d 11 (5th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Hall, 440 F.2d 1277 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Alva Johnson Rodgers v. United States, 451 F.2d 562 (5th Cir. 1971)