WILLIE LEE JOHNSON, ALIAS WILL JOHNSON, NO. 18914-149, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appeal must be dismissed because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Willie Lee Johnson appealed the denial of his motion to vacate his conviction and sentence. He filed his notice of appeal over 90 days after the distr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion To Vacate Conviction Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Johnson appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence. We dismiss the appeal as not timely filed.
On July 24, 1972, the district court denied Johnson’s motion for relief under § 2255. The appellant did not file a notice of appeal or similar document until October 24, 1972, when this Court received his “petition of appeal.” This petition was later filed in the district court on November 3, 1972, as a notice of appeal. The appeal proceeded forthwith without further authorization. See Rule 24(a), F.R.A.P. Rule 4(a), F.R.A.P., requires that notice of appeal in a case in which the United States is a party be filed within 60 days after the date of entry of the judgment or order sought to be appealed. The Rule further provides, in part, that “Upon a showing of excusable neglect, the district court may extend the time for filing the notice of appeal by any party for a period not to exceed 30 days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by this subdivision.” 1
Johnson’s “petition for appeal” was not received by this Court until two days after the 90-day maximum period for filing a notice of appeal had elapsed. This Coiirt, therefore, has no jurisdiction to entertain Johnson’s appeal, and it must be dismissed. Tribbitt v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1972, 462 F. 2d 600; Dunn v. Henderson, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F. 2d 1398; Bean v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1971, 437 F. 2d 112.
Appeal dismissed.
. The appellant has not alleged, nor does the record suggest, that his delay resulted from his “excusable neglect” or from any cause beyond his control. Cf. Tribbitt v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1972, 462 F. 2d 600.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Tribbitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, 462 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1972)
- Dunn v. Henderson, 446 F.2d 1398 (5th Cir. 1971)
- Bean v. Louie L. Wainwright, 437 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1971)