HERBERT J. TURNER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
WALTER E. CRAVEN, WARDEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the state court's finding of witness unavailability was presumptively correct and that the use of preliminary hearing testimony was permissible.
Turner was convicted of assault, robbery, and burglary. The victim was unavailable to testify at trial due to her medical condition, so her preliminar…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse State Court Findings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
Turner is a California state prisoner. He was convicted by a California state jury of felonious assault, robbery and burglary. The district court denied Turner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and Turner appeals.
The victim of Turner’s crime was an elderly woman. She testified at the preliminary hearing and was subject to cross-examination. By the time of trial, however, her doctor testified and the court found that her mental and physical state made her unavailable as a witness. The transcript of her testimony at the preliminary hearing was introduced to fill the gap of her absence.
We have approved such a practice in properly limited circumstances. United States v. Harless, 464 F. 2d 953 (9th Cir. 1972). Here, Turner challenges the unavailability of the witness. The finding of the state court on this issue is presumptively correct. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). We agree with the district court that for all practical purposes the witness was unavailable. See United States v. Allen, 409 F. 2d 611 (10th Cir. 1969). The state court made a careful inquiry on this issue, and we find no reason to upset its determination.
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Allen, 409 F.2d 611 (10th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Harless, 464 F.2d 953 (9th Cir. 1972)