CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, TENNECO CHEMICAL, INC., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT,
v.
THE M/V HUGH C. BLASKE, HER ENGINES, TACKLE, APPAREL, ETC., IN REM, AND AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE COMPANY, IN PERSONAM, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, V. CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., IN PERSONAM, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; BUNGE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., THE M/V PAT CHOTIN AND THE M/V JOEY CHOTIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, TENNECO CHEMICAL, INC., INTERVENOR-APPELLANT,
THE M/V HUGH C. BLASKE, HER ENGINES, TACKLE, APPAREL, ETC., IN REM, AND AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE COMPANY, IN PERSONAM, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES; AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, V. CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., IN PERSONAM, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS; BUNGE CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. CHOTIN TRANSPORTATION, INC., THE M/V PAT CHOTIN AND THE M/V JOEY CHOTIN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS
475 F.2d 1370
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the opinion of the District Court, reported at 356 F.Supp. 388 (E.D.La.1972).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Exxon Corp. v. Tex. Motor Exch. OF Houston, Inc., 628 F.2d 500 (5th Cir. 1980)
-
Barnes v. Atl. & Pac. Life Ins. Co. OF Am., 514 F.2d 704 (5th Cir. 1975)
-
In re McCLINTOCK v. Gen. Motors Acceptance Corp., 558 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1977)
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)