ROBERTO NAZARIO, APPELLANT,

v.

CARMEN L. NAZARIO, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• ONE Call Prop. Servs. Inc. v. Sec. First Ins. Co., 165 So. 3d 749 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)
  …Constr., Inc. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 651 So. 2d 141, 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (“[A] provision against assignment of an insurance policy does not bar an insured’s assignment of an after-loss claim.”); Gisela Invs., N.V. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 452 So. 2d 1056, 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (“A provision in a policy of insurance which prohibits assignment thereof except with consent of the insurer does not apply to prevent assignment of the claim or interest in the insurance money then due, after loss.”); see a…
• In re the Est. OF Carlos Rumaldo Herrera v. Berlo Indus. Inc., 840 So. 2d 272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …to make its ruling. Lastly, Herrera seeks to raise issues which were not raised in the trial court. However, issues not presented in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. See Gisela Invs., N.V. v. Liberty Mut. Insur. Co., 452 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Thus, Herrera is precluded from raising new arguments on appeal. Affirmed.…
• Landis v. Allstate Ins. Co., 516 So. 2d 305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …n Corp. v. Szabo, 453 So. 2d 43 (Fla.1984); Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Garcia, 424 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hester v. Gatlin, 332 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). The case cited for the contrary position, Gisela Invs., N.V. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 452 So. 2d 1056, 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), does not apply because the alternative ground urged there “was not specifically asserted by motion or argued to the trial court, and . . . was not supported by any evidence at the time of the hearing on the motion for summa…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
• Kuvin v. Kuvin, 442 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1983)
• Doyle Edward Conner v. Conner, 439 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1983)