ALC INTERIOR SYSTEMS AND SOUTHEASTERN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

GARY T. HALL, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Eagle-Picher Indus., Inc. v. COX, 481 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …y awarded future risk of cancer damages. The verdict form, in which the defendant acquiesced, does not reflect this, and since the other items of damages support the amount of the verdict, the defendant thus can prove no harm. See Barhoush v. Louis, 452 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. for rev. dismissed, 458 So. 2d 271 (Fla.1984). . There is a difference between fear of cancer and cancerphobia. The former, which does not require an expert witness to prove its existence, is a nonidiosyncratic response to the…
• Gonzalez v. Leon, 511 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …or the plaintiff (containing no itemization of damages) could have been based on the non-economic elements of damage such as “pain and suffering, inability to lead a normal life, and other intangible elements present in the case.” Barhoush v. Louis, 452 So. 2d 1075, 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). However, to the extent that the remark in LoBue survives the holding in Barhoush and is more than dictum, we acknowledge that our decision today conflicts with it. Affirmed. . Of course, the parties may prefer to have th…
• The City OF Miami v. Harris, 490 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  ….1978), so too the attorneys’ fees award here must be upheld where it is impossible to ascertain from the verdict form that the damages were not awarded on the count — Section 1983 — that would support an attorneys’ fee award. Cf. Barhoush v. Louis, 452 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA), pet. for rev. dism., 458 So. 2d 271 (Fla.1984). Although we have concluded that the verdict as returned will support an attorneys’ fees award, we nonetheless must remand the cause for further proceedings respecting the award. Where…