UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
MORRIS THOMAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
MORRIS THOMAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
479 F.2d 1326
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In compliance with the mandate set forth in Anders v.. California, 1967, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, we have carefully reviewed this cause in its entirety, and conclude that there is no arguable merit in the appeal. It is therefore ordered, that the motion filed by Neil L. Heimanson, Esquire, for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Appellant is granted, and the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. See Local Rule 20. See also United States v. King, 5th Cir. 1972, 456 F. 2d 1243; United States v. Mills, 5th Cir. 1971, 446 F. 2d 1397; United States v. Minor, 5th Cir. 1971, 444 F. 2d 521.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Minor, 444 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Mills, 446 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. King, 456 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1972)