DAVID J. LOCKWOOD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
David Lockwood appeals the denial of his post-conviction motion challenging the legality of his attempted burglary sentence. The court affirmed the sentence, holding that an attempt of any burglary is a third-degree felony under Florida law, permitting a sentence up to ten years under the habitual felony offender enhancement statute.
The court held that an attempt of any burglary is a third-degree felony under Florida Statute § 777.04(4)(c), regardless of the degree of the underlying burglary offense. Therefore, Lockwood was properly subject to the habitual felony offender enhancement statute, which permits sentences up to ten years for third-degree felonies.
[1] An attempt of any burglary is a felony of the third degree.
[2] A third degree felony is punishable by a sentence not exceeding ten years when enhanced sentences for habitual felony offenders apply.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“an attempt of any burglary is a felony of the third degree pursuant to section 777.04(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981).”
The core holding that establishes Lockwood's sentence was proper under the applicable statute.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceLockwood was convicted by jury of conspiracy to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and attempted burglary. He received concurrent sentence…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Felony Sentencing cases and more on FLexlaw
[*1118] PER CURIAM.
Appellant, David J. Lockwood, seeks review of the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(g) (1984). We affirm.
Appellant makes numerous allegations. We discuss only the claim that his sentence under Count III is illegal because it is in excess of the amount allowed by law.
The jury found appellant guilty of conspiracy to commit burglary, possession of burglary tools, and attempted burglary. A copy of the sentencing documents indicates that he was sentenced to one year on the charge of conspiracy to commit burglary, ten years for the possession of burglary tools and ten years on the attempted burglary charge. All three sentences were to be served concurrently.
Appellant argues that the attempted burglary charge was improperly treated as a second degree felony. He claims that to find that the attempt was a second degree felony, the specific crime attempted had to be considered first degree felony burglary under section 777.04(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1981). He claims that because the attempted burglary did not involve any dangerous weapons or a dwelling, and there was not a human being in the building, the burglary, if it had been completed, would have been considered a third degree felony pursuant to section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1981). Appellant states that under section 777.04, Florida Statutes (1981), an attempt of a third degree felony is considered a first degree misdemeanor. The sentence for a first degree misdemeanor must not exceed one year under section 775.02, Florida Statutes (1981). In this situation, appellant contends, even under the enhancement statute, the sentence may not exceed three years pursuant to section 775.084(4)(b)(l), Florida Statutes (1981).
Appellant’s argument must fail because an attempt of any burglary is a felony of the third degree pursuant to section 777.04(4)(c), Florida Statutes (1981). Williams v. State, 386 So. 2d 631 (Fla.2d DCA 1980). Under section 777.04(4)(c), a defendant may be sentenced under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1981), which provides for enhanced sentences for habitual felony offenders. Under that section, a third degree felony is punishable by a sentence not exceeding ten years. § 775.-084(4)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (1981). From the transcript of the sentencing hearing in this case, it is clear that the court found that this section applied to appellant. Therefore, appellant’s ten year sentence was properly imposed. For this reason, we affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief.
We note, however, that the judgment and sentencing documents reflect that appellant was convicted of a second degree felony. Aside from the provisions of section 777.04, this notation is inconsistent with the information because appellant was charged with third degree felony burglary. Therefore, there appears to be an error in the judgment and sentencing documents. We remand to the trial court for correction of those documents in accordance with this opinion.
HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.