PAULINE NENOFF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
GEORGE M. THOMPSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the plaintiff's claim for loss of consortium was legally certain to be less than the jurisdictional amount required for diversity jurisdiction.
Appellant, the widow of a man killed in a car accident, filed a diversity action for loss of consortium after a prior wrongful death action in Ohio st…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdictional Amount cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an action brought by appellant, the widow of a man who was killed while a passenger in defendant’s car when it went out of control at an exit ramp of an expressway in Toledo, Ohio. The administratrix of the estate of the deceased had previously brought a wrongful death action in an Ohio state court in which a jury had found no cause for action. Subsequently appellant filed this action for loss of consortium in the federal court before a District Judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division, asserting jurisdiction on grounds of diversity of citizenship.
The District Judge determined that under Ohio law her damages were limited to the two hours in between the happening of the accident and her husband’s death. He thereupon dismissed the cause of action for lack of the jurisdictional amount of over $10,000.
DeWitt v. Machine Co., 25 Ohio St.2d 40, 266 N.E. 2d 563 (1971), says (citing Shaweker v. Spinell, 125 Ohio St. 423, 181 N.E. 896 (1932)):
A spouse may recover only for loss of consortium between the time of injury and death. . . . DeWitt v. Machine Co., supra, 25 Ohio St.2d at 41, 266 N.E. 2d at 564.
Our examination of this record shows to a legal certainty that the claims are for less than the jurisdictional amount. Gill v. Allstate Insurance Co., 458 F. 2d 577 (6th Cir. 1972).
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lottie G. Martin v. Gibson, 723 F.2d 989 (D.C. Cir. 1983)
Authorities Cited
- Olive Gill v. Allstate Ins. Co., 458 F.2d 577 (6th Cir. 1972)