NORMAN GRADSKY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
NORMAN GRADSKY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
482 F.2d 1379
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
It is hereby ordered that this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction since the judgment sought to be appealed is not final as to all of the appellant’s claims.1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.P.; Graham v. Cole, 5th Cir. 1973, 483 F. 2d 255; Jones v. Riggsby, 5th Cir. 1973, 475 F. 2d 760; United States v. Crow et al., 5th Cir. 1973, 474 F. 2d 200.
Dismissed.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s local Rule 9(e)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 981.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Harding, 507 F.2d 294 (10th Cir. 1974)
Authorities Cited
- Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969)
- United States v. Crow, 474 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Zella Mae Graham v. Cole, 483 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Ottis Mayo Jones v. Riggsby, 475 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1973)