UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v.
JOSEPH JOHN FOURNIER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the prior appellate decision established the law of the case, precluding reconsideration of the sentence legality.
Appellant pleaded guilty to transporting a weapon and was sentenced. He filed a Rule 35 motion arguing an illegal sentence due to charging under a dif…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Law Of The Case Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM:
On August 26, 1971, Appellant Four-nier pleaded guilty to a charge of knowingly transporting a weapon in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. A. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a). On September 17, 1971, the District Court sentenced Fournier to a term of three years in prison.
Although Fournier appealed neither his conviction nor his sentence, he did file a motion under F.R.Crim.P. 35 to correct an illegal sentence. His main contention was that it was a violation of Equal Protection for him to be charged under Section 922 when he could have been charged under 18 U.S.C.A. App. § 1202(a)(1) with a maximum punishment of two years. Initially, on May 11, 1972, the District Court was impressed with this argument and reduced his sentence to two years. On reconsideration at the urging of the Government, however, the District Court, on May 26, 1972, vacated its order of May 11, 1972. The Court vacated this order because, on the authority of United States v. Chakmakis, 5 Cir., 1971, 449 F. 2d 315, the original three year sentence was legal.. Therefore, the Court was without jurisdiction to entertain a Rule 35 motion. See F.R.Crim.P. 45(b); United States v. Granville, 5 Cir., 1972, 456 F. 2d 1073. On appeal, we affirmed. United States v. Fournier, 5 Cir., 1972, 468 F. 2d 952.
Fournier filed another Rule 35 motion on January 12, 1973. The District Court denied all relief and Fournier appeals. We affirm. Our prior opinion is the law of the case.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Oakley G. Smith, 523 F.2d 771 (5th Cir. 1975)
-
United States v. Batchelder, 581 F.2d 626 (7th Cir. 1978)
-
United States v. Hammer, 496 F.2d 917 (5th Cir. 1974)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- United States v. Apostolos G. Chakmakis, 449 F.2d 315 (5th Cir. 1971)
- United States v. Granville, 456 F.2d 1073 (5th Cir. 1972)