NORMAN B. GORHAM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
ELLIOT L. RICHARDSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
NORMAN B. GORHAM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
ELLIOT L. RICHARDSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE
483 F.2d 71
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
In his petition for habeas corpus, Gor-ham alleges that the parole board deprived him of fundamental fairness and abused its discretion when it refused to grant him parole. As this Court, sitting en banc, has recently stated, “[i]n the absence of evidence of flagrant, unwarranted, or unauthorized action by the Board, it is not the function of the courts to review such proceedings.” Scarpa v. U. S. Board of Parole (en banc), 5 Cir., 1973, 477 F. 2d 278, 283. [Footnote omitted.] The record in the instant case reveals no evidence which would entitle Gorham to relief.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. Lundgren, 528 F.2d 1050 (5th Cir. 1976)
-
United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346 (7th Cir. 1978)
-
Grasso v. Norton, 520 F.2d 27 (2d Cir. 1975)
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Scarpa v. U. S. Bd. OF Parole, 477 F.2d 278 (5th Cir. 1973)