HORACE POWELL, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Summary Denial cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Horace Powell, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The allegation that appellant was improperly sentenced to serve consecutive three year minimum terms of imprisonment, if true, might entitle appellant to relief. The trial court, however, failed to conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach portions of the record which refute this allegation.
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, the trial court may either again summarily deny the motion as to the allegation and attach to its order those portions of the record which conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief or hold an evidentiary hearing and then rule on the ground alleged in the motion. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850; see also, Jones v. State, 421 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Van Bever v. State, 405 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). To obtain further review any aggrieved party must appeal the new ruling of the trial court.
REVERSED.
GRIMES, A.C.J., and SCHEB and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ruiz v. State, 743 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)…nia v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 105 S.Ct. 2066, 85 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); Ensor, 403 So. 2d at 352; State v. Loomis, 436 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Lightfoot v. State, 356 So. 2d 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Barnes, 691 So. 2d at 1161; Masters v. State, 453 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Ruiz also challenges his twenty year sentence for attempted first degree murder, which was an upward departure from the sentencing guidelines. Section 921.0016(3)®, Florida Statutes (1997), provides that a sentencing judge may d…
-
Barnes v. State, 691 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)…. State v. Lewinson, 644 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) (holding that, where defendant’s home was not fenced in such a manner as to prevent others from viewing his property, a warrant [*1162] was unnecessary to seize his marijuana); Masters v. State, 453 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984) (holding that the defendant’s marijuana patch, located outside a common fence or enclosure, was not entitled to Fourth Amendment protection). We accordingly affirm Barnes’s judgment and sentence. MICKLE, 'J., concurs. WEBSTER,…
Authorities Cited
- Jones v. State, 421 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
- VAN Bever v. State, 405 So. 2d 474 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)