LUTHER B. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TERRY HENSLEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
LUTHER B. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
TERRY HENSLEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
484 F.2d 992
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant’s failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules.1 Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F. 2d 1297.
. It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F. 2d 981.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Austracan v. M/V Lemoncore, 500 F.2d 237 (5th Cir. 1974)
-
B. B. Adams Gen. Contractors, Inc. v. Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev., 501 F.2d 176 (5th Cir. 1974)
-
Cole v. Forrest Tuttle, 540 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1976)
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kimbrough v. Beto, 412 F.2d 981 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Tidwell v. Hayden J. Dees, 464 F.2d 1297 (5th Cir. 1972)