CLAUDE FLIPPO, PLAIN TIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
CLAUDE FLIPPO, PLAIN TIFF-APPELLANT,
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE
486 F.2d 612
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:
Once again in a case where on Blue Cat1 readings the employee made himself out an ambiguous-amphibious seaman, Mike Hooks, Inc. v. Pena, 5 Cir., 1963, 313 F. 2d 696, 1963 A.M.C. 355, against the employer, TVA, we confess a certain bewilderment as to how the plain language of the 1949 amendment2 to FECA cuts off substantial rights recognized under the maritime law vis-a-vis a seaman employee and a governmental agency having a very relaxed sovereign immunity, Gulfspray I: Gulf Oil Corp. v. Panama Canal Co., 5 Cir., 1969, 407 F. 2d 24, 1969 A.M.C. 1; Gulfspray III: Gulf Oil Corp. v. Panama Canal Co., 5 Cir., 1973, 481 F. 2d 561, 1973 A.M.C. 1582 . Nevertheless, assuming the broadest congressional waiver of sovereign immunity by TYA, we find no meaningful distinction between TVA and other governmental agencies as to whom we have held that the claim of such a real or pseudo seaman strands on 5 U.S.C.A. § 8116(c). Johnson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 402 F. 2d 778, cert, denied, 1969, 394 U.S. 930, 89 S.Ct. 1195, 22 L.Ed.2d 459; Petition of United States, E.D.La., 1962, 212 F.Supp. 214, aff’d sub nom. Jarvis v. United States, 5 Cir., 1962, 342 F. 2d 799, cert.. denied, 1965, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75. Nothing new has been added, nothing new need be stated. So nothing new need be ordained.
Affirmed.
. Barber v. “Blue Cat”, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F. 2d 626, 1969 A.M.C. 211.
. 5 U.S.C.A. § 8116(c) :
“The liability of the United States or an instrumentality thereof under this sub-chapter or any extension thereof with respect to the injury or death of an employee is exclusive and instead of all other liability of the United States or the instrumentality to the employee, his legal representative, spouse, dependents, next of kin, and any other person otherwise entitled to recover damages from the United States or the instrumentality because of the injury or death in a direct judicial proceeding, in a civil action, or in admiralty, or by an administrative or judicial proceeding under a workmen’s compensation statute or under a Federal tort liability statute. However, this subsection does not apply to a master or a member of a crew of a vessel." (Emphasis added).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lunsford v. Price, 885 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1989)
-
Turner v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 859 F.2d 412 (6th Cir. 1988)
-
Hutchins v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 98 F.3d 602 (11th Cir. 1996)
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Captain Tom Barber v. The Motor Vessel "Blue CAT", 372 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1967)
- Gulf OIL Corp. v. Panama Canal Co., 407 F.2d 24 (5th Cir. 1969)
- Mike Hooks, Inc. v. Gonzalo Pena, 313 F.2d 696 (5th Cir. 1963)
- Megge v. United States, 382 U.S. 831 (U.S. 1965)
- Teitelbaum v. United States, 382 U.S. 831 (U.S. 1965)
- Young v. Mader, 394 U.S. 930 (U.S. 1969)
- Bankruptcy v. Beneficial Fin. Co., 394 U.S. 930 (U.S. 1969)
- Gulf OIL Corp. v. Panama Canal Co., 481 F.2d 561 (5th Cir. 1973)
- Mrs. Charles Jarvis v. United States, 342 F.2d 799 (5th Cir. 1965)