MICRO-MAGNETIC INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE,
v.
ARDAC, INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Patent Infringement cases and more on FLexlaw
SKOPIL, District Judge:
Appellee, Micro-Magnetic Industries, Inc., sued appellants, Ardac, Inc. and its subsidiaries, for infringement of United States Patent No. 2,964,641, referred to as the ‘Selgin II patent.
The suit upon the Selgin II invention was tried before the court which found that the Ardac machine infringed Claims 1, 4 and 5 of United States Patent No. 2,964,641. The court enjoined the defendants from infringing Claims 1, 4 and 5 without a license from Micro-Magnetic, and awarded damages for infringement based upon four percent of the price of Ardae’s machine. Ardac appeals from that judgment.
Having reviewed the record, we have concluded that the trial court’s findings of fact are clearly supported by the evidence. We agree with the trial judge’s opinion and affirm the case on the authority thereof. That opinion is reported at 372 F.Supp. 477 (D.C.1972).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litig. Sauquoit Fibers Co. v. Leesona Corp., 498 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1974)
-
Micro-Magnetic Indus., Inc. v. Advance Automatic Sales Co., Inc., 488 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1973)
Authorities Cited
- Micro-Magnetic Indus., Inc. v. Advance Automatic Sales Co., Inc., 488 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1973)