MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
WALLACE G. FERRY, XRG INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
MIDLAND INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
WALLACE G. FERRY, XRG INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
453 So. 2d 850
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1984)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., specially concurs with opinion.
Concurrence
ANSTEAD, Chief Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s order refusing to grant a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540 to set aside a judgment. I write separately only to note that on the record before us we are in no position to second guess the trial judge on his apparent determination that no valid excuse or justification was shown for the appellant’s failure to timely object to the entry of final judgment, either by way of motion or appeal.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Catalano, 104 So. 3d 1069 (Fla. 2012)…ons where the driver may have been under the influence of alcohol. See Kurecka v. State, 67 So. 3d 1052, 1060 n. 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); Conahan v. Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 619 So. 2d 988, 990 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); State v. Demarzo, 453 So. 2d 850, 853 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). Here, much like the cases cited above which do not find traffic safety to be a compelling state interest, the proscribed conduct involves an individual’s freedom of expression as it relates to safety on public thoroughfares…
-
Fla. Dep't OF Agric. & Consumer Servs. & The Fla. Comm'r of Agric. v. Mendez, 98 So. 3d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)…at a defendant’s challenge to a burden-shifting statute, contained in a pretrial motion, was not ripe “because prior to actual application of the alleged burden-shifting statute at trial, there can be no constitutional violation”); State v. Demarzo, 453 So. 2d 850, 852 & 853 n. 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (where the defendant was challenging the constitutionality of a state statute “mandating suspension of a [personj’s driver’s license when a court continuance requested by the defendant delays the hearing on the su…
-
Solomon v. State of Fla. & the Fla. Dep't of Motor Vehicles, 538 So. 2d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…mon may feel that the result in this case is unfair in light of his acquittal, considering the above criteria, it is obvious that the jury’s verdict, whatever its reasons therefor may be, is not a determinative factor. Moreover, in State v. Demarzo, 453 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), it was observed that “there is a compelling state interest in highway safety that justifies the legislature in allowing suspension of a driver’s license for failure to take a breathalyzer or blood alcohol test.” 453 So. 2d at 85…