DAVID C. WOODSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Thomas v. State, 599 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)
  …4); King v. Estate of King, 554 So. 2d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Corporacion Peruana de Aeropuertos y Aviacion Comercial v. Boy, 180 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965); Chaudoin v. State, 118 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1984); DeSantis v. Acevedo, 528 So. 2d 461, 462 n. 1 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1988); Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Byrd, 256 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Herman v. State, 372 So. 2d 996 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Parry v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins.…
• Ralph Maercks, M.D. & Ralph Maercks, M.D., P.A. v. Birchansky, 549 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …parative fault was an issue, we do not find error in the trial court’s ruling that evidence of other similar acts could be introduced for the purposes of showing the defendant’s state of mind and for impeachment. See Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So. 2d 1171, 1172-75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). REVERSED. . We do not mean to indicate by the result of this opinion that the conduct of defense counsel was entirely blameless. Appellee’s allegation that "if any such violations occurred they were surpassed by def…
• Archbishop Coleman F. Carroll High Sch., Inc. v. Maynoldi, 30 So. 3d 533 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …use of alcohol were directly relevant to, and probative of, the specific knowledge of the parents, their level of supervision of Gabriel, his access to a motor vehicle, and the jury’s allocation of comparative fault. Metropolitan Dade County v. Cox, 453 So. 2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). While it is certainly true that the proffered evidence is prejudicial to the appellees’ claims, that is no basis for refusing to allow the jury to consider it in this case. That evidentiary ruling would also require, were it not…

Authorities Cited

• Brod v. State, 437 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1983)
• Brod v. State, 418 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)