MCELRATH POULTRY COMPANY, INC., PETITIONER-CROSS RESPONDENT,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT-CROSS PETITIONER

5th Cir. | 1974-05-23
No. 73-3430
494 F.2d 518 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1974) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that employees involved in maintaining trucks used in farming are agricultural laborers and thus not covered by the National Labor Relations Act.


Facts & Procedural History

The NLRB sought to enforce a bargaining order. The employees in question included truck drivers and a mechanic who maintained the trucks used in farmi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

In this enforcement proceeding, with cross-petition for review, the NLRB acknowledges “. . . that disposition of the jurisdictional issue in the present case is controlled by this Court’s decision in Abbott Farms, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 487 F. 2d 904 (1973), in which, on similar facts, this Court found that the Board’s bargaining order was not entitled to enforcement because the employees in the certified unit were agricultural laborers.” 1

It nevertheless “. . . adheres to its position that employees like those in the present case are employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act ., and are not exempted from that coverage as agricultural laborers under Section 3(f) of the Fair Labor Standards Act . . . and Section 2(3) of the Act.”

The Board lacks jurisdiction.2 Enforcement denied.

. Two of the employees involved were primarily truck drivers, as in Abbott. One was a full-time mechanic who maintained the trucks. “By a parity of reasoning, those employees who repair the mechanical imx>lements used in farming are also included within the agricultural exemption.” Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co., 349 U.S. 254, 263, 75 S.Ct. 719, 725, 99 L.Ed. 1040 (1955).

. Abbott Farms, Inc. v. N. L. R. B., 487 F. 2d 904 (5th Cir. 1973) ; N. L. R. B. v. Victor Ryckebosch, Inc., 471 F. 2d 20 (9th Cir. 1972) ; N. L. R. B. v. Strain Poultry Farms, Inc., 405 F. 2d 1025 (5th Cir. 1969) ; Mitchell v. Georgia Broiler Supply, Inc., 186 F. Supp. 341 (N.D.Ga.1960).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw