CHARLES W. FROUST, PLAINTIFF,

v.

COATING SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. STEAMSHIP MUTUAL UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, V. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

5th Cir. | 1974-06-06

No. 73-2781

494 F.2d 1352 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1974) Positive Treatment

Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

[*1353] PER CURIAM:

The district court’s findings of fact stand undisputed. We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its adjudication, 364 F.Supp. 1154.

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

Scarborough v. Travelers Ins. Co., 718 F.2d 702 (5th Cir. 1983)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

CHARLES W. FROUST, PLAINTIFF, v. COATING SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. STEAMSHIP MUTUAL UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, V. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

CHARLES W. FROUST, PLAINTIFF,

v.

COATING SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. STEAMSHIP MUTUAL UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, LIMITED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, V. WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES