ROGER C. MYERS, D/B/A ROMYCO STEREO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
AMPEX, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTSAPPELLEES
ROGER C. MYERS, D/B/A ROMYCO STEREO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
AMPEX, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTSAPPELLEES
498 F.2d 1092
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to our remand,1 the district court for the Eastern Disrict of Texas has examined Appellant’s complaint in his action before the district court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The district court for the Eastern District of Texas again concluded that Appellant’s claim was identical to that dismissed in the Western District of Oklahoma. We affirm, concluding that the doctrine of direct estoppel bars the claim.2
. Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F. 2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974).
. See Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F. 2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955); 9 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil § 2373, at 238-39.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jim L. Napper and wife v. Anderson, 500 F.2d 634 (5th Cir. 1974)
Authorities Cited
- Isbell Enters., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. OF NEW York, 431 F.2d 409 (5th Cir. 1970)
- Estevez v. Nabers, 219 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1955)
- Myers v. Ampex, Inc., 491 F.2d 1103 (5th Cir. 1974)