UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF APPELLEE,
v.
HARMAN VICTOR USHER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

5th Cir. | 1974-09-09
No. 73-4022
500 F.2d 388 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1974) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to this court’s remand under United States v. Dover, 489 F. 2d 688 (5th Cir. 1974), the district judge who sentenced the defendant has supplemented the record in this cause with the statement “At the time I pronounced sentence in this case I determined and I now determine that the Defendant would not derive benefit from treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 5010(b) (The Youth Correction Act).” This statement complies with the district court’s duty under that act. Dorszynski v. United States, -U.S.-, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 41 L.Ed.2d -(1974).

Since Usher has never raised with the district court any question as to the propriety of his waiver of the right to be represented by counsel in that forum, we refuse to consider his contention to that effect on this appeal.

The judgment and commitment entered March 14, 1973 and the subsequent actions of the district court in this cause are

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw