MEREDITH CORPORATION, AN IOWA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, BRIAN SUTTON-SMITH, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND PRENTICE-HALL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS ON COUNTERCLAIM-APPELLANTS
MEREDITH CORPORATION, AN IOWA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES, BRIAN SUTTON-SMITH, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND PRENTICE-HALL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS ON COUNTERCLAIM-APPELLANTS
500 F.2d 1221
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1974)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM:
The appellants assert error in the grant of a preliminary injunction.
This is essentially a dispute between the publishers of competing textbooks in the child development field. The defendants-appellees, seeking redress as copyright holders, convinced Judge Owen upon a persuasive factual record that they would probably succeed on the merits, that the appellants had plagiarized their textbook, and that there was need for immediate relief. There was a sufficient basis for the findings and conclusions of the District Court and since they are not clearly erroneous, Fed.R. Civ.P. 52(a), we affirm.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harper & Row v. Nation Enters., 471 U.S. 539 (U.S. 1985)
-
Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Scoreboard Posters, Inc., 600 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir. 1979)
-
Harper & ROW v. Nation Enters. & the Nation Assocs., Inc., 723 F.2d 195 (2d Cir. 1983)
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence