ROBERT LEE LAWRENCE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1984-08-23
No. AU-225
BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
455 So. 2d 537 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1984) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
MILLS, Judge.

MILLS, Judge.

This case is before us pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the record and considered the parties’ briefs, we find no reversible error. AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Grey v. E. Airlines, Inc., 480 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
    …ort a finding that the claimant was not totally disabled after February 16, 1982, the claimant, nevertheless, could have qualified for TTD benefits had she conducted a sufficient good faith work search without success. Cf. Hirschensohn v. Personnel, 455 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). And, although she did not search for work during the time in question, under the line of cases exemplified by Fulmer-Orlando v. Taylor, 419 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), she cannot be saddled with the consequences of her failu…
  • Walker v. Gulf & W. Food Prods. & Nat'l Emp'rs Co., 461 So. 2d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
    …an’s testimony to the contrary in his order. The claimant contends this was error. We disagree. A deputy commissioner may accept the testimony of one doctor and reject that of another, even without explanation. Hirschensohn v. David Wood Personnel, 455 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984). Here, the acceptance of Drs. Sehayik’s and Ford’s findings that claimant did not sustain any permanent impairment as a result of his industrial accident was an implicit rejection of Dr. Juan’s finding to the contrary. See Glades…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw