STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
STAN JEROME RIVERS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1984-09-13
No. 63145
BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur., ADKINS, J., dissents.
456 So. 2d 462 Florida Supreme Court (1984) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
McDonald, justice.

McDonald, justice.

The opinion of the district court of appeal, Rivers v. State, 423 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), is quashed on the authority of State v. Page, 449 So. 2d 813 (Fla.1984). However, because on remand Rivers pled guilty to the charge, was sentenced, and has now served that sentence, no further proceedings are proper. It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nodar v. Galbreath, 462 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 1984)
    …ualifiedly privileged, which has different consequences from the "constitutional privilege" of New York Times. We recently held that a police officer is a public official for purposes of the New York Times constitutional privilege. Smith v. Russell, 456 So. 2d 462 (Fla.1984). However, nothing in the reasoning underlying that decision compels the conclusion that a public school teacher is a public official. . A communication, although it contains cri-minating matter, is privileged when made in good faith upon…
  • Demby v. English, 667 So. 2d 350 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
    …elected public official, she most certainly is a public officer wielding a portion of the sovereign power of this state, and the qualified privilege of every citizen to criticize such a public officer applies in this instance. See Smith v. Russell, 456 So. 2d 462 (Fla.1984) (holding a police officer is a public official), cert. den., 470 U.S. 1027, 105 S.Ct. 1392, 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985). In fact, even if appellee were not a public officer, the facts alleged in the complaint and in the amended complaint demon…
  • Stewart v. The SUN Sentinel Co., 695 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …oncluding that, for purposes of defamation, they are public officials and thus can recover only if they prove actual malice under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964). Defendants rely on Smith v. Russell, 456 So. 2d 462 (Fla.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1027, 105 S.Ct. 1392, 84 L.Ed.2d 782 (1985), in which a policeman used excessive force in making an arrest, and the defendant wrote letters complaining about the officer’s conduct. The officer sued the arrestee for…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw